Google

Monday, December 3, 2007

Another clash between Islam and the West?

Though I am ideologically opposed to generalizing an entire half of the world against a specific religion (especially when a strong majority of that religion isn't made up of radical militants), here's an interesting story regarding a Dutch politician's most recent attempt to incite rage in the local (and global) Islamic community.

To reiterate, I don't see this as part of the epic battle between the “West vs. Islam,” but more appropriately, it's a specific jab at radical Muslims that will not accept criticism of their religion. I do think that Geert Wilders (pictured), the man in question who desires to make a film depicting the less-than-virtuous side of the Prophet's life, makes a good point in trying to stand up for free speech with regards to all things Islam, because the violence that comes from criticism on this topic is unconscionable.

However, that does not preclude the fact that his idea for the film is anti-Islam propaganda, and though it is his goal, Wilders' proposition will stir up a lot of negative (and possibly needless) controversy. That said, I think he should produce his film if he feels strongly about it, though antagonism never really gets people very far.

My question is, though, how can he advocate “free speech” and then call for the Qur’an to be banned? If he wants a war, then he’ll get it. Sadly, this exposes exactly the thing he wants to do, which is incite militant Muslims to riot against him. Clearly he doesn’t want this problem to be mitigated, otherwise he wouldn’t fan the flames.

The main point here is that calling this a war between "the West" and Islam is very unfair to the rest of us. Most Muslims are not at war with Western Culture; in fact, many of them are simply trying to live within their tradition apart from the radical theocracy that is abundant in the Middle East, because they don't see their own beliefs reflected there, either. Therefore, while Wilders' objection to militancy is understandable, simply pissing people off is only going to make life harder for the Muslims that are not involved with that small minority; because no effort is being made to understand the religion as a whole, or engage with particular individuals, each Muslim gets lumped into a negative category.

In this sense, there is a conflict between Western Culture and Islam, because there is a perceived rift. If we're talking about being champions of free speech and free expression, then we need to be able to differentiate between those who are utilizing that freedom appropriately and constructively and those who are not, on both sides of the "clash." If unjustified violence and blind hatred fall into the realm of "not," then there's work to be done on all sides.

2 comments:

Greg Smith said...

Don't forget that Theo Van Gogh (Vincent's Grandson) was assassinated on the streets of Amsterdam for making a film that was critical of Islam. The Netherlands has welcomed Islamic migrants from around the world, only to have a small but significant number turn around, trash Dutch culture, and threaten violence against the Western system.

I agree that not every Muslim is out to destroy the West, but that is not really the issue. A violent brand of Islam has taken political control of a number of strategically important countries around the world, and even a few marginal neighborhoods and cities in Europe. This is important because even if a majority of Muslims aren't active participants in what is going on, they aren't doing much to stop the violence against police in Paris (140 injured in rioting over the weekend) or the suicide bombers that plague the middle east.

Radical Islam needs to be criticized, challenged, and combated. Otherwise, moderate Muslims will not feel the safety or moral imperative to rise up and take back their traditions from these thugs who currently control them.

Dan said...

What you're saying is completely spot on — Radical Islam in a political context is threatening the way that humans live their lives. Look at the U.S.' reaction to 9/11 and what our society has been since.

However, to mitigate this problem, does specifically insulting their Prophet and Holy Man (regardless of any truth in the content) do anything other than perpetuate this kind of reaction?

With Catholics and the DaVinci Code, a lot of people got mad and most of us laughed. You're correct in saying that radical Muslims won't react this way. The (probably impossible) problem is figuring out how to open a discourse with people who militantly oppose criticism, and I just don't think this is a constructive way to do so.